Top Hat_Ostrich Feather Dress_Ginger Rogers_Fred Astaire_Backbend.bmp © 2010 Lord Christopher Laverty. All rights reserved.

Top Hat: Ginger Rogers’ Ostrich Feather Dress

In 1935, Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers made cinema history with their most successful film partnership, Top Hat. However, it wasn’t Astaire’s headgear that got people talking; it was Rogers’ ostrich feather dress worn in the Oscar-nominated song ‘Cheek to Cheek’.

The fact remains that this is quite possibly the most memorable, beautiful and romantic musical number ever captured on film, and Rogers’ dress contributes to this greatly.

Whenever Astaire and Rogers dance, they are making love without undressing, without even kissing in the majority of their films; “they is angels” remarks unfairly condemned criminal Kofi as he fulfils his dying wish of watching the lovers perform ‘Cheek to Cheek’ in the film The Green Mile (1999).

In this scene, Rogers certainly does look like an angel in her now-famous dress, accessorised only by a glass panel-style bracelet (costume jewellery in enamel or glass was very fashionable in the 1930s), probably satin single strap high-heeled ballroom dancing shoes (the taps you can hear were added after filming) and her hair unusually twisted around her head to a large bun at the nape of her neck in an almost virginal way. Her make-up is beautiful and not over-done, which again suggests an angelic quality.

The plots of many of the Astaire-Rogers films were great fun but mostly forgettable and farcical cases of mistaken identity, Top Hat being no exception. In this scene, Jerry Travers (Astaire) is pursuing Dale Tremont (Rogers), a model employed by an Italian fashion designer Beddini (Erik Rhodes) to wear his glamorous gowns where they could be seen by the upper classes; an extremely current storyline as this was a time when film stars would bring designer clothes to life for the general public.

However, unbeknown to Travers, Dale believes that he is married to her best friend, which of course he isn’t. Dale is regretfully completely in love with Jerry and is in complete turmoil, which brings great emotion and sadness to the number.

As Jerry sings to her, Dale is transfixed and is almost expressionless, save for a stunning close-up at the end of the ‘seduction’ which shows her eyes glistening with tears. Thankfully Rogers was to win an Academy Award for her acting skills five years later for the part of Kitty Foyle, sans Astaire.

Beginning slowly, with Rogers trying to resist Astaire’s advances initially, he persists to pull her into the dance, almost wrapping himself in her arms. The dress floats divinely as Rogers falls into a number of backbends which become progressively deeper throughout the number, the final one giving in completely to her partner. She has yielded.

In the depression of the 1930s, many cinemagoers wanted to escape from the daily grind, and through imagining that these characters spent every moment living in the lap of opulence wearing evening dress, they could spend a dreamy hour or two at the cinema believing in this regained glamorous innocence.

Hollywood leading ladies were expected to be a showcase for couturier’s work, and Ginger Rogers was no exception. Rogers was adamant she was wearing the dress she had designed along with Bernard Newman, who had created many of her stunning gowns in previous Astaire and Rogers outings. Apparently he would value Rogers’ suggestions, showing her samples of luxurious fabrics, and on this occasion he sketched as she told him her wishes.

Rogers required a “pure blue” dress like the blue in Monet paintings, appropriate as it had been said that she was the watercolour to Astaire’s sketches. Of course, with the film being shot in black and white the colour wasn’t seen by the audience, but for costume designers it was vital nonetheless that the shades were sympathetic to the set at RKO Studios.

The gown was to be made of figure-hugging shimmering satin and encircled with ostrich feathers around the neck and shoulders and from the hips downwards. An Art-Deco style diamond-shaped diamante jewel at the neckline and a satin bow at the bottom of the back completes the look.

Rogers’ desired shape is interesting and very typical of the era – her wish was for a high front and a low back. After the intoxicating craziness of the 1920s, the Hayes Censorship Code in 1932 called for women to cover up their cleavage and show as little flesh as possible. Ironically enough, the female form was thus more visible than ever, as bare backs became ‘de rigueur’, and therefore no bras were worn and evening gowns clung to the body provocatively.

The bias-cut, introduced by the revolutionary Madeleine Vionnet who discovered that material cut on the diagonal allowed dresses to echo the fluidity of a woman’s shape, is a hallmark of the 1930s and was perfect for dancers such as Rogers as these allowed audiences to not miss a moment of the movements of her body.

Ginger was enamoured with the dress immediately as she rehearsed with Fred for the first time in her gown, at which the crew had commented “Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it’s Ginger’s dress!”, and even Astaire’s wife Phyllis had commented to spectator David Niven “she looks like a wooster!” (meaning ‘rooster’ as she couldn’t say her r’s properly).

It was nonetheless perfect for dancing in, the feathers (which had been extended at a cost of $1, 500) floating stunningly as Rogers glides across the equally beautiful but not at all realistic ‘Venetian Canal’ Big White Set (BWS), in the style that designers Van Nest Polglaise and Carroll Clark had become accustomed to creating, this their biggest stage yet.

Unfortunately for Astaire, some of the feathers floated so much that they fluttered off the dress and onto his face, his ‘white tie and tails’, and the floor in a blizzard-like fashion, which can still be seen on film to this very day. Of course, a disgruntled Fred wasn’t having any of it and much to Rogers’ disappointment the next thing she heard was that director Mark Sandrich wanted her to wear a dress she had already worn in The Gay Divorcee (1934).

“Feathers. I hate feathers/And I hate them so that I can hardly speak/And I never find the happiness I seek/With those chicken feathers dancing/Cheek to Cheek.” sung to the tune of Irving Berlin’s ‘Cheek to Cheek’ was Astaire and choreographer Hermes Pan’s humorous way of showing their disdain at Rogers’s self-designed dress. The whole episode was obviously on Fred’s mind 24 years later in his autobiography ‘Steps in Time’, when he named one of the chapters ‘Feathers’.

Somewhat of a taskmaster, Astaire already had grave misgivings about the film’s script, so when the wardrobe mistress, Clarkie, walked across set with what Astaire immediately described as “a chicken that’d been attacked by a coyote”, this took the biscuit.

But thankfully, a threat by Rogers and her notoriously matriarchal mother Lela Rogers to walk out if the film unless they got their way won over their male counterparts and the dress was back in the film, albeit with the feathers now sewn firmly on!

There was a rather frosty reception from the cast and crew towards Rogers as the rushes were shown. However, after a few days she received a white box with a matching bow, the note saying “Dear Feathers, I love ya! Fred.” Inside was a gold feather for her charm bracelet:

This was Fred’s way of making amends, as while they were not bosom buddies (save for a quick petting session in the back of a car in the late 1920s!) they had the utmost respect for each other as professionals and Fred often said that Ginger was his favourite leading lady as she just got on with the job in hand instead of crying like his other partners. This didn’t stop Astaire parodying the number with a rival of Rogers, Judy Garland, in the film ‘Easter Parade’ 13 years later.

Ironically enough, in the 1970s Ginger Rogers fulfilled her costume-designing dream further as she became fashion consultant to the American chain ‘J.C. Penney’ (see image above) , creating a 20 piece wardrobe for 700 stores across the USA. And the infamous ostrich feather dress? It resides at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC. And not a stray feather to be found.

© 2010 – 2014, Lord Christopher Laverty.

  • red2blues

    Astaire immediately described as “a chicken that’d been attacked by a coyote”, actually refers to something he said about how the dress looked after Rogers first started to dance in it. There was literally a feather storm and even the cameraman could not see them clearly. It was not Rogers fault, but rather due to the rushed sewing job. The feathers were not individually attached before the 1st wearing. Once they were individually attached, there were only a few that drifted off and you see them on the floor. Astaire had every right to be concerned about what his partner was wearing, since the dress became a third partner and could greatly increase the difficulty of the dance. I agree that the feather dress was very effective and added a great deal to the romance of the dance. Do you also comment on men’s costumes? I’d love to discuss them with you. I find what Astaire wears to be equally fascinating, although in a more subtle way. He was just as daring and influential as Rogers.

  • sarah h

    I am the writer of this article and I thank you so very much for your further insight. May I ask, from what source did you find out this information?

    I have been an Astaire and Rogers fan for the last 15 years (I am just 29!) and have always felt the costumes added greatly to their films, despite Ginger’s dresses understandably being a slight source of irritation to poor Fred (remember the beaded mirror dress in ‘Let’s Face the Music and Dance’ from ‘Follow the Fleet’? She totally slaps him with it!)

    I do comment on men’s costumes, but being as you seem to have a great deal of knowledge on the subject would you be interested in writing an article about Astaire? Go to the ‘Where am I?’page and contact Chris Laverty.

  • Weezie Jefferson

    Other than her dancing, I never got the Ginger Rogers love. She was no beauty face wise and she had really bad facial hair. Plus her politics made John Wayne look like Adlai Stevenson.

    • Weezie Jefferson

      PS – not to mention that her Oscar was one of the most undeserved in the Academy’s history. What a supremely overrated performance.

    • John

      In her 20s, Ginger Rogers was gorgeous!

  • Sarah H

    Unfortunately I don’t feel it necessary at this juncture to discuss her religious/political beliefs. Maybe someone more discerning would pick up on your “other than her dancing” comment as actually she wasn’t the world’s greatest dancer. But for the millions of people who saw her and Astaire’s movies, and equally the millions of people who still enjoy them today, the chemistry between them captivated audiences worldwide. There must be a reason for this. In the 1930s, Rogers made around 40 films (only 10 of which were with Fred) and she was the highest paid female movie star – again there was a reason for this. You say ‘Kitty Foyle’ is overrated – I say it’s UNDERrated as hardly anyone has heard of it now and that’s a shame. However, I watched it recently with someone who had no knowledge of Rogers and they (actually I’ll say “he” because unlike yourself, he found her extremely appealing) were entranced by her performance. Hurrah for her at a time of the great ACTORS like Joan Fontaine, Olivia DeHavilland, Bette Davis and the like. As for your highly personal “facial hair” comment, reading Ginger’s biography she never denied she had a little more ‘down’ on her skin, and took the shaving cream sent my Judy Garland with the contempt it deserved, as I’m sure she would your comment.

  • Rose

    I have not seen an actor or actress in my lifetime (and I am pretty darn old) that can match Ginger and Fred/Fred and Ginger. They were the whole enchilada. They could act, dance, sing, they were athletes, they were wonderful to look at and could wear clothing and make it look like art. They were INCREDIBLE – one of a kind. The old movies and musicals are of such complete quality in every aspect. No computer generated simulations; no use of sex or nudity to stand in for raw, athletic, artful talent. WOW!

    I would love to see books and books of Ginger’s costumes as well as Fred’s. His shoes, coats, suits, tuxedos, hats,handkerchiefs, etc.; and Ginger’s dresses, skirts, blouses, coats, hats, ball gowns, there are NO WORDS to describe the elegance. Where can I see more???

  • The Golden Age

    I’m in love with Ginger Rogers. She wasn’t the prettiest girl in Hollywood, but she was darn sure pretty enough. And due in part to her dancing, she had what I would consider the perfect body. What a great tush and legs. That smile…those eyes…that funny little laugh…”haaa haaa haaa”…the most perfect woman that’s ever graced the big screen. I fall in love with almost every character she ever played. I can’t take my eyes off of her, even when she’s dancing with Fred. She was just so much fun you can’t help but love her! My favorite actress of all time, bar none.

  • Alan

    I just watched Tophat for the first time and saw that dress for the first time. Where is this dress? Is it in a museum or collection somewhere? I would love to see it with my own eyes.

    Alan

  • Kate Dooley

    Ginger’s feather dress from Top Hat resides at the Smithsonian.

  • Pingback: FINDING INSPIRATION FROM THE 1930s | Weddings.xcuz.me