The Hunger Games_Jennifer Lawrence rubber suit, Josh Hutcherson_Image credit Lionsgate-1 © 2012 Lord Christopher Laverty. All rights reserved.

Review: The Hunger Games

Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth
Directed By: Gary Ross

Set to ignite many a misconceived fashion editorial, The Hunger Games succeeds as pure costume delight because first and foremost it serves narrative. Judianna Makovsky has brought to life a new world, not created a magazine spread.

The film is based on a trilogy of novels by Suzanne Collins and centres around Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence), who volunteers to take her sister’s place for the annual Hunger Games, a fight to the death contest in the wilderness between 24 ‘tributes’ aged 12-18 with only one winner gaining his/her freedom. Taking place in post-Apocalyptic North America presided over by a privileged few in Capitol, which resembles Logan’s Run crossed with the Star Wars prequels, tributes are selected from districts that many years ago instigated a failed revolution against their oppressors. The Hunger Games are Capitol’s way of reminding these districts of their place, plus some meagre hope for the future.

Costume designer Judianna Makovsky was careful to replicate clothing as described in Suzanne Collins books. However, compromises had to be made as not everything would translate well on screen. Katniss Everdeen’s (Jennifer Lawrence) leather coat worn when hunting, for example. In the text it is described as ‘oversized’, a hand-me-down from Katniss’ father, but in the film it is sleeker and more deliberately tailored.

Although the books already have a built-in fan base among young adults, this is a movie first, adaptation second. Story is everything; The Hunger Games needs to draw a new audience with no prior knowledge of its universe. Fortunately director Gary Ross strolls through the plot in no big hurry spelling out all we need while inspiring questions that will hopefully be answered in sequels. Ross is aided immeasurably by Judianna Makovsky’s costume design. Clothes are an intentional method of deciphering The Hunger Games’ politics.

Having the divide between right and left, rich and poor so blatantly defined is a godsend for newbies because Ross does not establish his world upfront but lets it unfold gradually throughout. We are given a hint at just how decadent Capitol has become when Effie (Elizabeth Banks) proudly rounds up combatants for the games standing in what appears to be the outskirts of a disused factory. A frail looking thing wearing fuchsia skirt suit with peplum, Effie transcends mere affluence by adhering to a doctrine of crippling physical misery via fashion. She cannot possibly be comfortable tottering in high heel booties, her ribs crushed by corsetry and face slathered in translucent powder. Of course, this is the point; she is just as much a prisoner as Katniss.

Effie Trinket (Elizabeth Banks), Capitol chaperone for Katniss. Banks’ costumes echo the style of avant-garde Italian fashion designer Elsa Schiaparelli (1890–1973), creator of the celebrated ‘shoe hat’, amongst many other ground breaking and zany ideas.

When the story arrives at Capitol proper we are introduced to conspicuous consumption run amok. The clothes are quite beautiful in isolation and perfectly fitted – several lounge suit variations on Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci) especially – though it is all just too much; too many pockets on jackets, too much pouf on dresses, too much appliqué and far too much colour. Those in Capitol have no limits so wear absolutely everything, seemingly at once. It is all form and no function. Cinna (Lenny Kravitz), Katniss’ stylist for the Games is a notable exception; his clothes are subtle, just black suits and no tie, with gold eyeliner a minor indulgence.

The contrast between Capitol and the districts is silk and cotton. Katniss may hunt deer in long leather boots and a leather coat, but when she joins her sister for the selection lottery, a delicate early 19th century prairie dress is chosen (most likely compulsory). These dresses would be homemade and probably a source of some pride to their owner, though Katniss wears hers with palpable scorn. Capitol prefer inhabitants of the districts to appear wanting and humble. Any semblance of hope must be earned.

The Capitol guards’ uniforms are loosely based on modern day motorcycle police but attired in white rather than black (taken from the books); Judianna Makovsky found inspiration in the simplicity of Tony Walton’s work for Fahrenheit 451 (1996).

Later in the story, Katniss’ clothes alternate between training/outdoor gear and conscious display intended to court Games’ sponsors, her ‘Girl on Fire’ silk taffeta showstopper being as impressive (and oddly plausible) as you might hope. To say Katniss seems just as comfortable in both styles signifies that, for the moment anyway, she is in limbo. Her true calling has not become apparent. Jennifer Lawrence’s performance in The Hunger Games is a highlight. When the pace flags, which occurs on several occasions under weight of exposition, her charisma carries it through. Katniss may not have much of an arc in this particular film but Lawrence has firmly embedded herself within the character. If for some reason she cannot return for the sequels they might as well reboot it.

While ultimately nothing new and weak under cross-examination (why would everyone in Capitol actually enjoy watching children kill each other?), The Hunger Games is still exciting and gently satirical enough to please most audiences, not just teenagers. As with all adaptations of admired books it cannot and will not please everybody. Jennifer Lawrence, however, will.

The Hunger Games was released on 23rd March.

© 2012 – 2014, Lord Christopher Laverty.

  • http://www.houseofparadox.com.au Naomi Ross

    Don’t you just love the costumes? Any idea what the relevance of the Mockingbird pin is? Great review.

    • http://clothesonfilm.com Chris Laverty

      Thanks. I’ve not read the books so assumed the mockingbird pin was something referenced in those? Hopefully it’ll become clear in the sequels.

    • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com Nathan Albright

      I am a fan of the books; without revealing too much, the symbol is extremely relevant in ways that will become very obvious in both the second and third/fourth(?) movies. One of the books in the series is called Mockingjay, in light of the seriounessness of the nature of the symbol.

  • ECJ

    I thought that kick ass leather coat and boots the Katniss was distracting. I kept wondering if she was so poor and hungry why didn’t she sell her clothes?

  • grog

    leather coat and boots: she needs them because she hunts. She’s not as poor as others because she hunts. In the book, Peeta’s mother says, “District 12 might finally have a winner…that girl, she’s a survivor.” Katniss is a survivor and she needs good boots to do it. Also, the coat was her father’s so it has sentimental value (although in the movie it looks a bit fitted to be her father’s).

  • bcarter3

    I found your site through RottenTomatoes.com, and want to compliment you on your interesting and insightful way of looking at movies. I’ll be reading more of your reviews!

    The pin isn’t a mockingBIRD, it’s a mockingJAY, which is a bird that only exists in the world of “Hunger Games”. The mockingjay repeats and echoes what it hears. Remember how Katness and Rue used it–as a signal that everything was all right.

    • http://clothesonfilm.com Chris Laverty

      Of course, you’re right. I’m new to the Hunger Games world but that was sloppy of me.

  • http://www.themidnightgarden.net Wendy Darling

    Love this post! In response to the question about the mockingjay, it’s also significant because it’s something that should not exist, and later it becomes a powerful symbol throughout the Districts. A little bit more about it here.

  • Pingback: Igrzyska ?mierci czyli przegl?d prasy | Kacza Zupa()

  • Pingback: Costume Round Up: Flights of Fantasy |()