Home » Clothes from 1970s, Sartorial Analysis

Sartorial Analysis: Denim on Film – Part 3

Third and final part of a sartorial analysis examining denim as symbolic recognition for character on film – focusing on The Parallax View (1974) starring Warren Beatty.

The Parallax View_Warren Beatty_denim jacket bar.bmp

Action Man:

By the mid-1970s denim had been accepted as day wear for everyone, though still remained intrinsically associated with adolescent ‘drop out’ culture.

Warren Beatty was 37 at the time of shooting The Parallax View so could hardly be described as young; he looks just a little uncomfortable in a sky-blue western denim jacket and brown twill hip-huggers. Nonetheless the casual denim jacket remains a potent symbol of 1970s action hero. Mainstream acceptable yet scruffy, Beatty’s attire resists his character Joe Fredy’s profession as a determined journalist, but not his wayward personality.

The Parallax View_Warren Beatty_denim jacket bar-2.bmp

A denim jacket in this era subliminally plants the seed of action in our mind. With his shaggy hair (that ten years previous would have been ridiculed as ‘deviant’ and no doubt contributes to his ribbing by a hic deputy) he struts around town almost embarrassed; like everyone is afraid of him because of the way he looks. His jacket is a clear nod to the frontier Wild West. It legitimises Beatty’s Fredy as a man capable of more than posing.

Political unrest and the fallout from sixties youth rebellion leant the public to now distrust authority figures and their typical uniform – the suit and tie. At this stage starchy James Bond was struggling to look young and fresh (in more ways than one). The era of the messy hero had dawned, and this situation would remain so until at least the mid-1990s.

Consider Keanu Reeves in 1993 action thriller Speed. He spends most of the film dressed in a plain white t-shirt, something that was thought of as underwear until the 1950s. Indiana Jones too only ever wears a suit (by choice) for lecturing or formality. The moment things get hairy, Temple of Doom (1984) being a perfect example of this; he throws on the famous grubby leather bomber and khakis. It’s his iconography. How we identify him. Indy’s silhouette is known the world over.

Chuck Norris was rarely seen without his own denim ‘Action Slacks’ in the 1980s. They were specially designed to stretch in the seat and groin for those all important high kicks and spontaneous squat thrusts. By the time Warren Beatty in The Parallax View soils his denim jacket by scrapping in a bar and then covering it with mud during a police chase, he has – in an example Chuck would eventually follow – made full use of the fabric’s inferred masculinity.

The Parallax View_Warren Beaty brown twill boat.bmp

A few scenes on and Beatty swaps his dishevelled combo around for light blue denim jeans and a brown twill western jacket. Things are serious now; more white collar. Parallax do recruit potential murderers but they draw the line at layabouts wearing a denim jacket. Beatty’s denim is the epitome of distrust and free thinking radicalism. This is what sums up his character. Ultimately it is what seals his fate as a patsy.

So, did Warren Beatty help sales of the classic waist-length western denim jacket in any meaningful way? Doubtful. By 1974, denim was already the most popular fabric of the decade.

The Parallax View_Warren Beatty_denim jacket bar-1.bmp

Levi were far and away the biggest selling denim clothing manufacturers at this time. Though up to denim’s true birth as leisurewear during the 1950s, Levi were overshadowed by the much larger Lee Mercantile Company (Lee jeans). Incidentally Beatty’s denims were not made by Levi – perhaps because such noticeable corporate branding would have seemed odd in light of the story’s premise?

Thirty five years on and denim on film still fails to ignite our sartorial choice. Think about how many modern movies dress their protagonists in jeans? Not that many when you consider the amount of people actually wearing jeans on a daily basis. This is probably because denim, on men in particular, just doesn’t look very good on camera.

© 2009, Chris Laverty.

Related Posts:

  1. Sartorial Analysis: Denim on Film – Part 1
  2. Sartorial Analysis: Denim on Film – Part 2
  3. Rear Window: Grace Kelly in Jeans

Share/Bookmark this!

4 Comments

  • Thanks for your comment, Priscilla.

    My reference was to how Warren Beatty looked on film. This is the basis of the article: on film. Whether or not Beatty looked comfortable wearing denim or having shaggy hair in real life is irrelevant in this context. Moreover Beatty’s denim costume did ideally represent the divergence of his character, yet the fabric (for better or worse, unintentional or deliberate) remains closely aligned with youth.

  • Priscilla says:

    To suggest that Beatty looked uncomfortable in his denims or because of his hairstyle in “The Parallax View” is ridiculous. If anything, this is THE movie for which Beatty did not change his real life appearance AT ALL!
    Beatty has always been non-conformist, no slave to fashion. The look he has in the movie is the way he felt best around that time, the way he looked in his private life between, roughly, 1971 and 1975.

  • Priscilla says:

    Hi Chris,
    Thanks for responding. I WAS talking about how he looked in the movie. I clearly stated that to suggest he looked uncomfortable in this movie was ridiculous, considering the fact that his appearance differed practically nothing from his real life appearance. Ergo: if he as you suggest “looked uncomfortable” in his own dress style, he would have looked that way throughout the period I mentioned, off camera too.

  • Film and real life are not interchangeable.

    In the film Joe Fredy’s choice of denim represents his rejection of vanity; in real life Beatty’s choice of denim could well have represented the same. My point is this is irrelevant. What Beatty wears in the movie, regardless of what he wore in real life, will always be costume. Just because he looked comfortable wearing denims on his own time, does not mean he will necessarily look this way in front of a movie camera.

    Thanks again for making your point though, Priscilla. Your opinions on the subject have been interesting.

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally recognized avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Fitting Notes

This entry was posted by Chris Laverty on August 22, 2009 at 08:21 and filed under Clothes from 1970s, Sartorial Analysis category.

You can add your comments or trackback from your own site. To keep you updated to the latest discussion, you can subscribe to these comments via RSS.

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally recognized avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Random Togs

UK Film Review: The Road

Film Review: 2012

Atonement: Keira Knightley’s Green Dress

Category Trunk

Cufflinks

Screen style & identity, also reviews & sartorial news